What are the consequences for taking away a vested right?

If the City chooses not to honor a vested right, the City will be responsible for a takings claim under the Utah and United States Constitution(15). This means the City will have to pay the difference in market value of the property before the taking as compared to after the taking(16). The City currently has a large number of properties with vested rights. As a result, not honoring these vested rights will likely result in a loss of hundreds of millions of dollars to landowners, and the City will be responsible to compensate these landowners for their loss. This is why the City Council has taken the position that Proposition 6 does not affect properties with vested rights.

Sources

(15) U.S Const. Amend. V. (“nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation”); U.C.A. 1953, Constitution Art 1, § 22

(16) City of Hildale v. Cooke, 28 P.3d 697, 703 (2001); see also Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S 469 (2005) (for a more thorough discussion on requirements for a takings claim)

Show All Answers

1. What is a vested right?
2. What is a land use?
3. What is an application?
4. When does a vested right occur?
5. When does a vested right expire?
6. Can the City, or the citizens through an initiative or referendum, take away a vested right?
7. What are the consequences for taking away a vested right?